🎨 Is 2 Tank Vs King Tiger

The shell’s ability to travel at about 2,200m in an estimated 2.2 seconds (and sometimes even faster) meant this tank had the capability to destroy enemy tanks from a distance, keeping the Tiger out of enemy range. The King Tiger Tank was not without its problems. GPU: ATI Radeon 4870 X2. Kind of a war buff and I got to thinking if an old german king tiger can stand a chance against an american M1 Abrams. I mean the King tiger was the baddest tank ever built during WWII and even though the M1 abrams is advanced and everything old russian T-72's have been known to blow them up. The M6 37 mm gun used by the M8 greyhound cant penetrate the rear, or any other part of a Tiger II, even at point blank range. No Tigers IIs were even in the area at the time of the alleged incident and the American unit that was there, didnt claim a kill there. The story arose when an officer from a completely different unit said he witnessed it. The IS-2 is the early-generation second variant of the IS heavy tank family. With the arrival of the Panthers and Tiger Is on the German side, the escalation between German and Soviet engineers reached a new level, and the IS-2 was forced into service as soon as its primary armament was ready. The new heavy tank was the Soviet response to the 2. NomadProd. • 4 yr. ago. Id say no, tigers were encountered officialy only 3 times between D-Day and V-Day by American tanks. Two of these times shermans were involved but I there's no evidence of them being easy eights. 34. Chopawamsic. • 4 yr. ago. one of those times involved an M26 Pershing rather than an M4 Sherman. the other two They would go nowhere close to damaging the Abrams. Simple use of composite materials in the Abrams armour makes it way less brittle and gives it more effective armour. Tigers were good at what they did, but they aren't that good as to kill an Abrams. Abrams would have an effective 600-900mm armour, whereas the 8,8cm KwK on the Tiger can Men of War: Assault Squad 2. VETERAN TIGER. This is a guide on the proper use of anything armored, amongst a plethora of other useful information. Use the tiger and hull destroy Persing and IS-2. They are tanks that surpass Tiger. The best way is to break their turret. On paper the king tiger is good, and thus it is good in game. However, real warfare isnt a dick ahem gun measuring contest of who has the biggest caliber. Irl the king tiger got noscoped by a m8 lol. The kingtiger i believe, was statisticly great too in the bit of combat it saw in WW2. A similar instance was when Michael Wittmann engaged a British armoured column. He positioned his tank parallel to the column and proceeded to go slowly down the line shooting. In the space of 15 minutes 14 tanks, 15 personnel carriers & 2 anti-tank guns were destroyed. A testament to the power of the Tiger Tank in the hands of a good crew. King Tiger: Exceptional armament for pak43 did outperform any anti tank gun in WW2. But the gun was big and could not be applied to any tank under 50-55tons and germany could not afford building thousands of 50ton tanks armed with the 88. Tiger I. The King Tiger is actually the superior tank of course, having better armor and firepower. But it is also the least reliable and the one that can be produced in fewer numbers, which were both actually bigger factors to why Germany had trouble with allied tanks than raw armor and firepower where; and besides, they both have armor and firepower over there opponents. On the Way to the King Tiger. There is an unwritten rule in tank building: start working on a replacement for the tank that you just built. This rule is especially true in wartime. In some cases, work on the replacement began before the predecessor left the drawing board. This is how work started on the Tiger II, the heaviest mass produced tank The Panzerkampfwagen Tiger Ausf.B, also known as Tiger B, Tiger II, King Tiger, Königstiger or Royal Tiger, was the heaviest and arguably the most powerful tank to see combat service in World War 2 (though it was eclipsed in weight by its tank destroyer derivative, the Jagdtiger). At 69.8 metric tons, the Tiger Ausf.B was significantly heavier Now T-54 versus Centurion Mk.3 is a kinda fair fight, as is a T-55 versus the Centurion Mk.5. But putting a Centurion Mk.5 against a Tiger I is like putting an Amorous Moose up against a snap-happy tourist. EDIT: In that After about the second time, it stops becoming interesting, and you just go inside to get the hose and brush ready, because Big tanks like the King Tiger were mobile fortresses if properly sited in ambush positions. But on the attack, advancing down narrow, icy roads as the Tiger II did during the Battle of the Bulge qGJcgY.

is 2 tank vs king tiger